The sharp exponential scale of edit-distance distortion
OpenAI research collection · 3 manuscripts · Source checked 2026-10-19
OpenAI's result summary
Determines the least distortion of embedding edit distance on words of length at most d into real ℓ_(1): it is exp(Θ(\sqrt{log dloglog d})). Insertions, deletions and substitutions have unit cost. The constants are uniform over all finite alphabets with at least two symbols, even when the alphabet grows with d; binary words already force the lower bound.
Read the manuscripts
Short excerpts below come from OpenAI's abstracts. The full abstract and original PDF preserve the paper's precise scope.
MANUSCRIPT 01
Edit Distance in l1: Matching Bounds up to Constants in the Exponent
We determine the exponential scale of the least ℓ_(1) distortion of unit-cost edit distance on all strings of length at most d. For every sufficiently large d, uniformly over finite alphabets of size at least two, the distortion lies between exp(c\sqrt{log dloglog d}) and exp(C\sqrt{log dloglog d}) for absolute constants c,C>…
Full source abstract
We determine the exponential scale of the least ℓ_(1) distortion of unit-cost edit distance on all strings of length at most d. For every sufficiently large d, uniformly over finite alphabets of size at least two, the distortion lies between exp(c\sqrt{log dloglog d}) and exp(C\sqrt{log dloglog d}) for absolute constants c,C> 0. The lower bound already holds on binary strings of one common length. Thus the order of logarithmic distortion is sharp up to absolute constants.
This exact PDF is not listed in the imported formalization catalogue. Family scope notes may contain further information.
Finite-Circle Obstructions, Binary Codes, and Histogram Embeddings for Edit Distance
We give two finite-circle constructions of binary strings whose least ℓ_(1) distortion is exp(\Omega(\sqrt{log dloglog d})), where d bounds their length. Both constructions supply words of one common length for every sufficiently large cap. Two direct binary coding arguments transfer the constructions with absolute distortion…
Full source abstract
We give two finite-circle constructions of binary strings whose least ℓ_(1) distortion is exp(\Omega(\sqrt{log dloglog d})), where d bounds their length. Both constructions supply words of one common length for every sufficiently large cap. Two direct binary coding arguments transfer the constructions with absolute distortion and logarithmic block width. We also develop the overlapping-substring method of Ostrovsky and Rabani into a complete finite histogram embedding at the same exponential scale, uniformly over all finite alphabets and all words of length at most d, including the empty word.
This exact PDF is not listed in the imported formalization catalogue. Family scope notes may contain further information.
Tree Constructions for the l1 Distortion of Binary Edit Distance
We give two independent constructions of binary words of one length at most d whose ordinary edit-distance metrics require ℓ_(1) distortion exp(\Omega(\sqrt{log dloglog d})) for every sufficiently large d. We also prove a constant-distortion binary conversion for one prescribed input length. Together with the companion upper…
Full source abstract
We give two independent constructions of binary words of one length at most d whose ordinary edit-distance metrics require ℓ_(1) distortion exp(\Omega(\sqrt{log dloglog d})) for every sufficiently large d. We also prove a constant-distortion binary conversion for one prescribed input length. Together with the companion upper embedding theorem, these lower bounds determine the order of logarithmic distortion uniformly over finite alphabets with at least two symbols.
This exact PDF is not listed in the imported formalization catalogue. Family scope notes may contain further information.
New mathematical reasoning could help AI tackle harder scientific and computational problems. How reliably these skills transfer beyond mathematics will determine how much they contribute to general intelligence.